Comments on: How is the September 11th attack not a conspiracy? http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html UFO videos, images and reports from all over the world. Tue, 22 May 2012 16:16:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: desertviking_00 http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html#comment-31485 desertviking_00 Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:09:26 +0000 http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html#comment-31485 Because it was a martyrdom operation designed to create "Dar Al Harb" (world at war) so that the Salafist Jihadists could carry out similar operations to work at establishing "Dar Al Islam". Because it was a martyrdom operation designed to create “Dar Al Harb” (world at war) so that the Salafist Jihadists could carry out similar operations to work at establishing “Dar Al Islam”.

]]> By: Preston B http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html#comment-31484 Preston B Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:53:05 +0000 http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html#comment-31484 the Conspiracy theory is that the FBI knew about the attacks and did nothing to stop it. but there is always someone going to bomb us somewhere so the thought is that only a few are legit. but whitch ones??? the Conspiracy theory is that the FBI knew about the attacks and did nothing to stop it.
but there is always someone going to bomb us somewhere so the thought is that only a few are legit. but whitch ones???

]]> By: Nicole W http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html#comment-31483 Nicole W Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:45:30 +0000 http://www.ufo-watch.com/conspiracies-2/how-is-the-september-11th-attack-not-a-conspiracy.html#comment-31483 A conspiracy would mean that people on the inside of the operation planned to harm it. The terrorists were not bound by our laws nor were they citizens, nor were they government officials who were "in on it". That's the general definition of conspiracy. The government (supposedly) was not "in on it". A conspiracy would mean that people on the inside of the operation planned to harm it.

The terrorists were not bound by our laws nor were they citizens, nor were they government officials who were “in on it”.
That’s the general definition of conspiracy. The government (supposedly) was not “in on it”.

]]>