Comments on: what are the conspiracy theorys for the moon landing?

By: zeitgeist

zeitgeist — Tue, 22 May 2012 04:34:44 +0000

Conspiracy theorists say:
-That the lighting in certain photographs is too bright since they are in the shadows. However it has been shown that the reflection off moon dust is enough to light up these photos.
-Flag looks like it is waving in the wind, but there is no atmosphere and wind, how is this possible? The motion created as the astronaut drills the flag into the ground can make it seem like the flag is waving.
-Footprints are too clear. There is no water on the moon to hold footprints together and give such clear prints. However, the composition of the moon is different from that on earth. Moon dust is much coarser, therefore making it possible to mold such clear footprints.

Furthermore, it is very difficult to produce the movements of the astronauts, unless in a reduced gravity environment. Studio magic of the 60s couldn’t make everything possible.

By: guanotwozero

guanotwozero — Tue, 22 May 2012 04:16:48 +0000

Ah, there is no limit of conspiracy theories. They could feasibly argue the following:

The Moon Landings were claimed to be the result of the USA’s ‘space program’ to put man on the moon.

However, what the government is keeping from us is that Columbus never made it across the Atlantic as two of his three boats fell off the edge of world. The third was eaten by a sea monster before it even got close. It’s a well known fact that the ‘Sea Monster Belt’ is virtually impassible to ships, even before they reach the dangers beyond.

America doesn’t exist, it’s all a big hoax. Yes, we’ve all seen the ‘footage’, but we know that stuff can be easily faked. Statue of Liberty indeed! It’s just that little one they have in Paris with a fake cardboard ‘city’ background. That ‘grand’ canyon is just a small valley in South Wales done with some fancy photographic filters.

Notice how so many of these space ‘scientists’ claim to be working in some US institute like JPL or MIT. They’re clearly in on it too, you can’t trust anything these charlatans say. Verifiable evidence? Ha! They’re all working for the same masonic government puppet-master.

As for all those so-called “Google Maps” satellite photos of America, notice how the shadows are all wrong? You can’t see any of the stars reflected in ‘Great Lakes’, proving that they’ve all been faked. And why can’t we see all those fluttering flags in Chicago, despite them claiming it’s a ‘windy city’? Yes, we can see right through their claims – who do they think they’re fooling?

Wake up and smell the instant coffee – make your own decision about this ‘moon landing’ and ‘America’ hoax!

By: makemyday

makemyday — Tue, 22 May 2012 03:20:31 +0000

Well they have instruments on the moon. I don’t know what they’re all for but i know one acts as a laser receiver so that we can measure the distant of the moon from earth.
However it is odd though because when you see the film of the moon landing, when they leave the moon on that little ship (forgotten what it’s called, the Eagle?) the camera pans up as it lifts off the surface. Unless theres just some technology i don’t know of that they made to do that.