Comments on: Belivers Vs Skeptics Part3 : aka debeunking “NASA 2012 PLANET X SIMULATION”

By: mariobaluba

mariobaluba — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:12:56 +0000

Jupiter,Io,Callisto,Ganymede and Europa??

By: theinspectorwank

theinspectorwank — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:45:45 +0000

planet finder,com answers are there for you? …..its JUPITER!!!!!!

By: draft200100

draft200100 — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:36:43 +0000

Yokes can be make by everbody but now serious… Everybody knows (just look in to the wikipedia) that Jupiter haves 5 big moons rotating on the same plane (discovered at first by Galileo). All the other ones from the 64 moons Jupiter haves are very small and can´t be captured here. So what is the other big moon moving out of plane at 0:40? at the upper right side??? And where is the fifth one?

By: melenmike

melenmike — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:59:07 +0000

@seizuresnshit `well thats the? problem thees video’s are keeping coming…

By: draft200100

draft200100 — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:44:39 +0000

Melenmike…mmmmhhh… you mean this is becauze of the perspective!? Can´t imagine… I am not happy with the? explanation. Does anybody have a satisfactory explanation?

By: nutwithatheory

nutwithatheory — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:32:57 +0000

@draft200100 You can generally only see 4 of Jupiter’s moons through a small scope. They’re not always visible at the same time either depending on their position or magnification used. The other bright light source is probably a background star — possibly HIP 117375 based on the Oct 5 video? date.

By: iRacerMatt

iRacerMatt — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:40:00 +0000

jupiter?

By: mikie8865

mikie8865 — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:40:57 +0000

wonderful capture !!!!! what? kind of camera did you use ?

By: BADASSELVIS

BADASSELVIS — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:09:09 +0000

FILMED-WITH-A-PANASONIC-HDR-H60P–MAGICPIX-ON—ON-A-TRIPOD-THANKS-ALL—-!?

By: colm103

colm103 — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:12:22 +0000

So when is this bad boy arriving. Or when will it be so obvious that the panic will set in. Is? this why there is the economic chaos and distractions.

By: AndreyKlimkovsky

AndreyKlimkovsky — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:42 +0000

This is not Nibiru. Thit? is Uranus over over Jupiter.

By: AndreyKlimkovsky

AndreyKlimkovsky — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:08:42 +0000

This is not Nibiru. Thit is Uranus? over over Jupiter.

By: batfly

batfly — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:42:16 +0000

What caused the Asteroid? belt?

By: MrAtrophy

MrAtrophy — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:20:09 +0000

@batfly , it was either a planet that did not form or a collision of two large objects in the early stages of the formation of the solar sysytem that then? failed to reform into a new planet . if it had happened at any point in human history or prehistory , the chaos from the collision would have left evidence on near by bodies would also destroy all life on earth. if nibiru had come though the solar system the devastation would be see on a scale that would destroy multiple planets .

By: MrAtrophy

MrAtrophy — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:16:23 +0000

@batfly ? , that is a good question

By: batfly

batfly — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:57:39 +0000

Are star systems? usually binary?

By: MrAtrophy

MrAtrophy — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:03:46 +0000

@batfly , i don’t believe there is a “usual” in a system a random and numerous as solar system formation? . but i know of single and binary star’s . if jupiter and saturn would have formed as one mass , it would have been a second sun for us . but the are both to small to start fission , and formed separately .

By: batfly

batfly — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:31 +0000

@MrAtrophy

I heard that an? elliptical binary system is the more common in our galaxy? Sometimes you may even find 3 stars… but the solitary star is more rare.

By: batfly

batfly — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:01:31 +0000

Found this on Australia Telescope Outreach and Education:

Actually most stars are in binary systems. Perhaps up? to 85% of stars are in binary systems with some in triple or even higher-multiple systems.

By: MrAtrophy

MrAtrophy — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:01:24 +0000

@batfly : imagine.gsfc.nasa(dot)gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980402c.html
Somebody once said that “2 out of every 3 stars are in a binary”. Seriously, the fraction is very high, but it’s difficult to be precise, because it’s difficult to prove that a certain star is definitely single. Of the stars nearest to the Sun, about half are known to be in? multiple systems.

Koji Mukai
for Ask an Astrophysicist